tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post6657085002966343432..comments2023-12-24T13:03:35.696+00:00Comments on Miserable Old Fart: Pascal's Environmental WagerAlwyn ap Huwhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06194724336424525283noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-37772664551654541012008-06-27T08:31:00.000+01:002008-06-27T08:31:00.000+01:00Pascal's Wager sounds fine but it doesn't really a...Pascal's Wager sounds fine but it doesn't really apply ..... the global warming cult are already taking about actively intervening in the environment to prevent their doomsday scenario ... these interventions could themselves cause untold environmental damage.<BR/><BR/>There's also a price to pay for the global warming fantasies of the doom-mongers and it's being paid by the poor. Certainly not Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-56126845017233466872008-06-27T06:36:00.000+01:002008-06-27T06:36:00.000+01:00You miss the main point of my post, David. I don't...<I>You miss the main point of my post, David. I don't have the ability to look at the scientific evidence objectively. I am not a scientist.</I><BR/><BR/>That is the challenge of scientists of all persuasions, demonstrating their arguments in the clearest way possible. It hasn't happened yet, we've either been faced by unpenatrable stats or bare faced propaganda.<BR/><BR/><I>I am of an age to DRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17579389903229741089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-76897357758955520962008-06-27T06:33:00.000+01:002008-06-27T06:33:00.000+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.DRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17579389903229741089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-16321378734582166782008-06-27T01:28:00.000+01:002008-06-27T01:28:00.000+01:00David (Cynical Dragon) Said:I think people should ...<B>David (Cynical Dragon)</B> Said:<BR/><BR/><I>I think people should actually step back and look at the scientific evidence</I><BR/><BR/>You miss the main point of my post, David. I don't have the ability to look at the scientific evidence objectively. I am not a scientist. <BR/><BR/>I am of an age to remember when scientists (paid by tobacco companies) claimed that smoking was good for asthma!<Alwyn ap Huwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06194724336424525283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-39578787413332527022008-06-26T22:18:00.000+01:002008-06-26T22:18:00.000+01:00I welcome your comments, however I think that Pasc...I welcome your comments, however I think that Pascal's Wager is the wrong way to deal with this.<BR/><BR/>I think people should actually step back and look at the scientific evidence, more specifically avoid the pseudo-scienitific tosh peddled by people like Al Gore. I'm not suggesting we do nothing and I certainly don't suggest spending millions of pounds of tax payers money on something that DRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17579389903229741089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-4571108495870478552008-06-26T19:59:00.000+01:002008-06-26T19:59:00.000+01:00Very good post and you are surely right in your co...Very good post and you are surely right in your conclusion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8120478390983403863.post-293311776873288642008-06-26T19:43:00.000+01:002008-06-26T19:43:00.000+01:00I am sure Gordon Brown is on the same side of the ...I am sure Gordon Brown is on the same side of the argument as Flynn. Could somebody tell me then why did he go begging to the Saudis to turn on the oil taps to over-drive last week?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com