A perfect example of this can be found in the support for
the paper's anti Welsh attitude garnered from Paul Murphy: who warns against 'excessive' spending on Welsh
language schemes!
The very word bilingual suggests something to do
with TWO languages so any perceived cost of bilingualism should, surely, be
shared between BOTH languages. A monolingual transcript of Assembly proceedings,
in either language, would have a price tag attached. So how much of the £400K bilingual
waste of money is actually being spent on JUST the Welsh
Language?
Does English come free of charge?
However I am willing to agree with the Western Mail,
translation costs money and in these straightened times money is short. When witnesses
appear before committees of the Assembly and present their evidence in Welsh,
or when members address those committees in Welsh, translations are a waste of money;
they are unneeded and cost too much; after all those of us who can understand
Welsh can sacrifice that wasteful spending on English in order to put
that wasted money into more worthy pots! Translating those contributions into English
is expensive, a waste of money and shouldn't be allowed!
I have attended many hundreds of bilingual meetings in Wales
during the past forty years, without ever using any translation facility – as a
fluent user of both Welsh and English I don't need translators – those who need the translation facilities are the mono-linguist English, not us bilingual Welsh speakers!
Translation, in Wales, is primarily, spending on the English Language!
Translation, in Wales, is primarily, spending on the English Language!
As a monolingual English speaker I am bemused at the fuss, surely if there is to be access to the full record of the proceedings of our National Assembly then it is automatically in both national languages. To argue otherwise is to say that there is only one national language in Wales. Simple.
ReplyDeleteIt's high time the full costs of the English language to the Welsh taxpayer in education, local government, national government, road signs, public service announcements etc etc are calculated and made public. Just how much is this obsession with the English language costing us year in, year out?
ReplyDeleteThe obsession over the Translation cost's is sabber rattling by the Western Mail, it's the English reminding us all that we are a conquered people. And the fact that we as a Nation still speak our own language really, rankles them!
ReplyDeleteThis is just the typical anti-English, anti-non Welsh-speaking-Welsh attitude from a nationalist. Everyone in Wales should have access to Welsh democracy, not just the Welsh speaking minority, everyone. This goes equally for those Welsh speakers who would prefer Welsh language translations, as for those people who cannot speak Welsh. To exclude people on language is, frankly, biggotted.
ReplyDeleteYour blog post is just as nasty, bigotted and mean as the article in the Western Mail you are criticising. You are a hyprocrite.
You're quite right. Welsh speakers don't translating services it's the monolingual person, that's a fact. So how about if the authorities started charging 50p every time somebody wanted a translation service from Welsh to English? Could be an incentive for people to learn too.
DeleteOh "Geraint" get a life, you sad little man.
Have a look at the definition of "irony" on one of the online dictionaries Geraint!
DeleteWell the Assembly member for Aberconwy is supporting the Welsh language and I say good on her
ReplyDeleteDoes St Janet speak Welsh?
ReplyDeleteIs St Janet learning Welsh?
As a monoglot Scot in Wales I might learn a bit faster if I didn't always get a cheat sheet with the translation done for me.
ReplyDeleteThere are just over 3,000,000 people living in Wales; 300,000 of them speak Welsh fluently and/or class it as their first language. That is 10% of the population, or slightly under if we want to be pickerty, which I don’t, so we’ll call it “10%”. The cost of translation has been estimated at £400,000, not a lot if you break it down into per person:per year ratio.
ReplyDeleteIn our ever increasing politically correct society should we also not translate all the meeting minutes into other languages? There are 870,000 non-Welsh/English people residing in Wales who class their first language as non-Welsh/English, the statistics do not give a breakdown of what their first language is but if we allow for the A8 countries (EU), one or two African countries and of course Asians, Chinese, Indian and Pakistanis we can then determine 14 to 15 different translations would be required at a cost of, approx, £4.5 million, with the Welsh translations added to it we can “round it off” at around the £5m mark.
At this point I will become “pickerty” if Welsh speakers, who also mainly speak English, can justify spending £400,000 just to make a point then why not fully commit the tax-payers money to full equality and translate into all languages?.....after all what’s good for the goose....
Are you sure of your statistics? 870 thousand non native speakers? That's 29% of the population. 30% of the population were born in England so that means natives are in the minority. Sorry, that does not sound right, and I live in Swansea near the muslim quarter.
DeleteYour colonial assertion that Welsh speakers should be made to speak English just because they can marks you out as an English imperialist, not surprising for someone who stood for the BNP in N Wales.
"There are 870,000 non-Welsh/English people residing in Wales who class their first language as non-Welsh/English"
ReplyDeleteA lie.
The latest “up to date” statistics are from 2011 and I’ve allowed a 0.3% increase for this year. As you will see the “Other White” are from the A8 countries, no breakdown given, “Mixed” I haven’t included as one would expect them to have Welsh/English as their first language.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2011/may/19/ethnic-breakdown-england-wales?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
I do not expect an apology, nor is one needed; the point I was trying to make, my “anonymous Friend”, was that if the minutes of all WAG meetings are to be translated into Welsh then surely, in our politically correct society, all minority groups should have it translated into their language too, or is that something that should only be reserved for the 10% Welsh speakers?
There are nowhere near 870,000 people living in Wales who's first language isn't Welsh or English. You need to go back to BNP boot camp to brush up on your stat-maniupulation skills, your latest attempt is beyond poor.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Vaughan Hughes in "Barn": In 1849 Queen Victoria called for Welsh to be taught in all schools in Wales alongside English. After 163 years of royalist approval why hasn't it been implemented fully?
ReplyDeleteI embrace everones' opinions but no-one has touched on the fact that the Welsh langauge in a form nor their people were the original inhabitants of 'this' isle. Don't ask "what's your point" just stating fact!!!
ReplyDeleteI am an Englishman living in Wales and make an effort to get to know as many local folk as I can. I confess that only a very few of the Welsh natives I have been fortunate enough to become acquainted with can speak Welsh. So the tenure of the argument that any money wasted is wasted on the English language is poppycock. Abolish English and most Welsh will become instantly illiterate. Next, my council has run out of money and a third of the equipment in its main sports centre has stood broken for months. That's sad, particularly as many disabled and G.P. referred patients use the facility. Money spent on the Welsh language could instead be used for this and equally worthy projects. Finally, it seems to me that so much money is spent on the Wesh language because the Welsh language fanatics smash the property of citizens not providing both languages. They reaked havoc in my village a couple of years ago causing several thousands of pounds of damage. The police need to root out these terrorists. Once the terror threat is liften then hopefully sanity will prevail, and millions of pounds of wasted expendiuture saved.
ReplyDelete